Is absence of proof, proof in itself?

I mean, is the inability to see a black and white dingdong proof that a dingdong doesn’t exist?

I mean, Clumpo is likely female!

I am uncomfortable dressing Clumpo up in clothes that announce gender, such as pink bows or blue bowties. Yet at the same time, without these visual cues, Clumpo is going to look like a pile of genderless mush for about the first 3 months of her/his life anyways, and it would be pretty awkward having Clumpo mistaken for the opposite gender.

I joke about dressing Clumpo in burlap sacks, but if you thought really hard about which gender is most likely associated with a burlap sack, would you be able to come up with an answer? If I was asked which gender of baby is most likely to wear burlap, I would answer “Teddy Roosevelt” or “Dustbowl”. My mind simply cannot process a proper answer. Burlap seems like a viable clothing choice.

Clumpo continues to wiggle and jiggle. Clumpo’s head is on the right side of the “Shikyuu”, and we feel twings around Yuki’s belly button and thumps around the left side. I hope Clumpo is doing squats in there. There is no excuse for skipping leg day, even if you are negative 3 months old.